Search This Blog

25 Advanced Solved Numericals on Redox Reactions

25 Advanced Solved Numericals on Redox Reactions | Chemca

Masterclass: 25 Solved JEE Advanced Numericals on Redox Reactions & Volumetric Analysis

Conquer electron transfer! This exhaustive guide features highly complex multi-step problems on n-factor calculations, Iodometry, Permanganometry, and Disproportionation. Click "View Solution" to reveal the step-by-step breakdown.

Problem 1: Complex n-factor Calculation
Determine the n-factor and the equivalent weight of Ferrous Oxalate (${FeC_2O_4}$) when it is completely oxidized by Potassium Permanganate (${KMnO_4}$) in an acidic medium. (Given: Molar mass of ${FeC_2O_4} = 144 \text{ g mol}^{-1}$).
View Solution

Step 1: Identify the oxidation changes
In ${FeC_2O_4}$, iron is in the $+2$ state (${Fe^{2+}}$) and the oxalate ion is ${C_2O_4^{2-}}$ (where Carbon is in the $+3$ state).
When oxidized by strong acidic ${KMnO_4}$:
1. ${Fe^{2+}} \rightarrow {Fe^{3+}} + 1e^-$ (Oxidation state of Fe changes from $+2$ to $+3$).
2. ${C_2O_4^{2-}} \rightarrow 2{CO_2} + 2e^-$ (Oxidation state of C changes from $+3$ to $+4$. Since there are 2 carbon atoms, total electron loss $= 2$).

Step 2: Calculate total n-factor
In this specific compound, both the cation and the anion undergo oxidation simultaneously.
Total moles of electrons lost per mole of ${FeC_2O_4}$ = $1 \text{ (from Fe)} + 2 \text{ (from C)} = 3$.
Therefore, the n-factor = $3$.

Step 3: Calculate Equivalent Weight
Equivalent Weight ($E$) = $\frac{\text{Molar Mass}}{\text{n-factor}}$
$E = \frac{144}{3} = 48 \text{ g eq}^{-1}$.

Answer: n-factor = $3$; Equivalent Weight = $48 \text{ g eq}^{-1}$.
Problem 2: Disproportionation Reaction n-factor
What is the n-factor and the equivalent weight of Phosphorus ($P_4$) when it undergoes a disproportionation reaction in an alkaline medium to yield Phosphine ($PH_3$) and Hypophosphite ion (${H_2PO_2^-}$)? (Molar mass of $P_4 = 124 \text{ g mol}^{-1}$).
View Solution

Step 1: Write the skeletal reaction and oxidation states
$P_4 \rightarrow PH_3 + {H_2PO_2^-}$
Oxidation state of P in $P_4 = 0$.
Oxidation state of P in $PH_3 = -3$ (Reduction).
Oxidation state of P in ${H_2PO_2^-} = +1$ (Oxidation: let ox state be $x$; $2(+1) + x + 2(-2) = -1 \implies x - 2 = -1 \implies x = +1$).

Step 2: Calculate individual n-factors for oxidation and reduction
For reduction ($P_4 \rightarrow 4PH_3$): Change per atom = $|0 - (-3)| = 3$. For 4 atoms, $n_{red} = 4 \times 3 = 12$.
For oxidation ($P_4 \rightarrow 4{H_2PO_2^-}$): Change per atom = $|0 - 1| = 1$. For 4 atoms, $n_{ox} = 4 \times 1 = 4$.

Step 3: Apply the Disproportionation Formula
When the exact same species undergoes both oxidation and reduction, the overall n-factor ($n_{total}$) is calculated using the formula for parallel resistors:
$n_{total} = \frac{n_{ox} \times n_{red}}{n_{ox} + n_{red}}$
$n_{total} = \frac{4 \times 12}{4 + 12} = \frac{48}{16} = 3$.

Step 4: Calculate Equivalent Weight
$E = \frac{M}{n_{total}} = \frac{124}{3} = 41.33 \text{ g eq}^{-1}$.

Answer: n-factor = $3$; Equivalent Weight = $41.33 \text{ g eq}^{-1}$.
Problem 3: Iodometry (Indirect Titration)
An excess of Potassium Iodide ($KI$) is added to $50 \text{ mL}$ of an unknown $CuSO_4$ solution. The liberated Iodine ($I_2$) requires $20 \text{ mL}$ of $0.1 \text{ M}$ Sodium Thiosulfate (${Na_2S_2O_3}$) solution for complete reduction. Calculate the molarity of the original $CuSO_4$ solution.
View Solution

Step 1: Understand Iodometric Reactions
Reaction 1 (Liberation of Iodine):
$2Cu^{2+} + 4I^- \rightarrow Cu_2I_2 \downarrow + I_2$
Reaction 2 (Titration of Iodine with Hypo):
$I_2 + 2{S_2O_3^{2-}} \rightarrow 2I^- + {S_4O_6^{2-}}$

Step 2: Apply the Law of Equivalence
According to the law of equivalence across sequential reactions:
Equivalents of $Cu^{2+}$ = Equivalents of $I_2$ liberated = Equivalents of ${Na_2S_2O_3}$ used.

Step 3: Calculate n-factors
For $Cu^{2+} \rightarrow Cu^+$ (in $Cu_2I_2$), the change in oxidation state is 1. So, n-factor of $CuSO_4$ = 1.
For ${S_2O_3^{2-}} \rightarrow {S_4O_6^{2-}}$, oxidation state of S changes from $+2$ to $+2.5$. Change = $0.5$ per S atom. For 2 S atoms in the formula, n-factor = $2 \times 0.5 = 1$.

Step 4: Solve the Volumetric Equation
$N_1 V_1 (CuSO_4) = N_2 V_2 ({Na_2S_2O_3})$
Since n-factors are 1, Normality = Molarity for both.
$M_1 \times 50 \text{ mL} = 0.1 \text{ M} \times 20 \text{ mL}$
$M_1 \times 50 = 2.0$
$M_1 = \frac{2.0}{50} = 0.04 \text{ M}$.

Answer: Molarity of $CuSO_4$ is $0.04 \text{ M}$.
Problem 4: Mixture of Salts Titration
A mixture of $H_2C_2O_4$ (Oxalic acid) and $NaHC_2O_4$ (Sodium binoxalate) weighing $2.02 \text{ g}$ is dissolved in water and made up to $1.0 \text{ L}$. $10 \text{ mL}$ of this solution requires $3.0 \text{ mL}$ of $0.1 \text{ N } NaOH$ for complete neutralization. Another $10 \text{ mL}$ of the same solution requires $4.0 \text{ mL}$ of $0.1 \text{ N } KMnO_4$ for complete oxidation in an acidic medium. Calculate the mass of each component in the original mixture.
View Solution

Step 1: Analyze Acid-Base Titration (NaOH)
Both $H_2C_2O_4$ and $NaHC_2O_4$ are acidic and will react with $NaOH$.
Let molarity of $H_2C_2O_4$ be $x$ and $NaHC_2O_4$ be $y$.
n-factor for neutralization: $H_2C_2O_4$ is a dibasic acid ($n=2$). $NaHC_2O_4$ is a monobasic acid salt ($n=1$).
Equivalents of acid = Equivalents of base.
$(2x + 1y) \times 10 \text{ mL} = 0.1 \text{ N} \times 3.0 \text{ mL}$
$2x + y = \frac{0.3}{10} = 0.03$ --- (Equation 1)

Step 2: Analyze Redox Titration (KMnO₄)
Both compounds contain the oxalate ion (${C_2O_4^{2-}}$) which oxidizes to $CO_2$.
n-factor for oxidation: Both $H_2C_2O_4$ and $NaHC_2O_4$ release 2 electrons per molecule ($n=2$).
Equivalents of reductant = Equivalents of oxidant.
$(2x + 2y) \times 10 \text{ mL} = 0.1 \text{ N} \times 4.0 \text{ mL}$
$2x + 2y = \frac{0.4}{10} = 0.04$ --- (Equation 2)

Step 3: Solve the Simultaneous Equations
From Eq 2: $2x + 2y = 0.04$. Subtract Eq 1 ($2x + y = 0.03$):
$(2x + 2y) - (2x + y) = 0.04 - 0.03$
$y = 0.01 \text{ M}$ (Molarity of $NaHC_2O_4$).
Substitute $y$ in Eq 1: $2x + 0.01 = 0.03 \implies 2x = 0.02 \implies x = 0.01 \text{ M}$ (Molarity of $H_2C_2O_4$).

Step 4: Calculate Masses in 1 Liter
Since volume is $1.0 \text{ L}$, moles = molarity.
Moles of $H_2C_2O_4 = 0.01 \text{ mol}$. Molar mass $= 90 \text{ g/mol}$. Mass $= 0.01 \times 90 = 0.90 \text{ g}$.
Moles of $NaHC_2O_4 = 0.01 \text{ mol}$. Molar mass $= 112 \text{ g/mol}$. Mass $= 0.01 \times 112 = 1.12 \text{ g}$.
Check total mass: $0.90 + 1.12 = 2.02 \text{ g}$ (Perfect match!).

Answer: Mass of $H_2C_2O_4$ is $0.90 \text{ g}$; Mass of $NaHC_2O_4$ is $1.12 \text{ g}$.
Problem 5: Fractional Oxidation State Paradox
Determine the average oxidation state of Bromine in Tribromooctoxide ($Br_3O_8$). Explain this fractional value by drawing its chemical structure and assigning absolute oxidation states to each individual Bromine atom.
View Solution

Step 1: Calculate Average Oxidation State algebraically
Let oxidation state of Br be $x$. Oxygen is usually $-2$.
$3x + 8(-2) = 0$
$3x - 16 = 0 \implies x = +16/3$.
Since an atom cannot literally lose a fraction of an electron, $+16/3$ is simply a mathematical average.

Step 2: Draw the Structure of $Br_3O_8$
The molecule is a linear chain of three Bromine atoms.
Structure: $O_3Br - Br(O_2) - BrO_3$
The terminal Bromine atoms are each double-bonded to three Oxygen atoms.
The central Bromine atom is double-bonded to two Oxygen atoms and single-bonded to the two terminal Bromine atoms.

Step 3: Assign Absolute Oxidation States via Electronegativity
Oxygen is more electronegative than Bromine. Every bond to an Oxygen atom counts as $+1$ for Bromine.
Terminal $Br_1$: Bonded to 3 Oxygen atoms (double bonds = 6 bonds). O.S. = $+6$.
Central $Br_2$: Bonded to 2 Oxygen atoms (double bonds = 4 bonds). Bonds to other Bromines do not contribute to charge separation. O.S. = $+4$.
Terminal $Br_3$: Bonded to 3 Oxygen atoms (double bonds = 6 bonds). O.S. = $+6$.

Step 4: Verify the Average
Average = $\frac{+6 + +4 + +6}{3} = \frac{16}{3}$.

Answer: Average O.S. is $+16/3$. Absolute states are $+6, +4, +6$ based on the $O_3Br-BrO_2-BrO_3$ structure.
Problem 6: Volume Strength of H₂O₂
A bottle of Hydrogen Peroxide is labeled "22.4 V". Calculate the Molarity, Normality, and Percentage Strength ($\text{w/v}$) of this solution.
View Solution

Step 1: Decode "Volume Strength"
A label of "22.4 V" means that $1.0 \text{ Liter}$ of this $H_2O_2$ solution will decompose to yield exactly $22.4 \text{ Liters}$ of Oxygen gas ($O_2$) at STP.

Step 2: Reaction Stoichiometry
$2H_2O_2 \rightarrow 2H_2O + O_2$
According to the balanced equation, $2 \text{ moles}$ of $H_2O_2$ produce $1 \text{ mole}$ of $O_2$.
At STP, $1 \text{ mole}$ of $O_2$ occupies $22.4 \text{ Liters}$.
Since $1 \text{ L}$ of our solution produced $22.4 \text{ L}$ of $O_2$, it means $1 \text{ mole}$ of $O_2$ was produced.
Therefore, moles of $H_2O_2$ present in $1 \text{ L}$ of solution = $2 \text{ moles}$.
Molarity ($M$) = $2.0 \text{ M}$.

Step 3: Calculate Normality
The n-factor for $H_2O_2$ in redox reactions (whether acting as an oxidant or reductant) is $2$.
Normality ($N$) = Molarity $\times$ n-factor = $2.0 \times 2 = 4.0 \text{ N}$.

Step 4: Calculate Percentage Strength ($\text{w/v}$)
Molar mass of $H_2O_2 = 34 \text{ g/mol}$.
Mass of $H_2O_2$ in $1 \text{ Liter}$ ($1000 \text{ mL}$) = Moles $\times$ Molar mass = $2.0 \text{ mol} \times 34 \text{ g/mol} = 68 \text{ g}$.
Percentage strength is mass per $100 \text{ mL}$.
$\% \text{ w/v} = \frac{68 \text{ g}}{1000 \text{ mL}} \times 100 = 6.8\%$.

Answer: Molarity = $2.0 \text{ M}$; Normality = $4.0 \text{ N}$; Strength = $6.8\% \text{ (w/v)}$.
Problem 7: Balancing Complex Redox (Ion-Electron Method)
Balance the following disproportionation reaction in a basic medium using the ion-electron method: $Cl_2 + OH^- \rightarrow Cl^- + ClO_3^-$. Determine the sum of all the stoichiometric coefficients in the balanced equation (in simplest integer form).
View Solution

Step 1: Separate into Oxidation and Reduction Half-Reactions
Reduction half: $Cl_2 \rightarrow Cl^-$
Oxidation half: $Cl_2 \rightarrow ClO_3^-$

Step 2: Balance Reduction Half
Balance atoms: $Cl_2 \rightarrow 2Cl^-$
Balance charge by adding electrons: $Cl_2 + 2e^- \rightarrow 2Cl^-$ --- (Eq 1)

Step 3: Balance Oxidation Half (Basic Medium)
Balance Cl atoms: $Cl_2 \rightarrow 2ClO_3^-$
Balance O atoms: Add $6H_2O$ to the left side.
$Cl_2 + 6H_2O \rightarrow 2ClO_3^-$
Balance H atoms: Add $12H^+$ to the right side.
$Cl_2 + 6H_2O \rightarrow 2ClO_3^- + 12H^+$
Since it's a basic medium, neutralize $H^+$ by adding $12OH^-$ to BOTH sides.
$Cl_2 + 6H_2O + 12OH^- \rightarrow 2ClO_3^- + 12H_2O$
Simplify water: $Cl_2 + 12OH^- \rightarrow 2ClO_3^- + 6H_2O$
Balance charge: Left side is $-12$, right side is $-2$. Add $10e^-$ to the right.
$Cl_2 + 12OH^- \rightarrow 2ClO_3^- + 6H_2O + 10e^-$ --- (Eq 2)

Step 4: Equate Electrons and Add
Multiply Eq 1 by $5$ to get $10e^-$:
$5Cl_2 + 10e^- \rightarrow 10Cl^-$
Add to Eq 2:
$6Cl_2 + 12OH^- \rightarrow 10Cl^- + 2ClO_3^- + 6H_2O$
Divide by 2 to get simplest integer form:
$3Cl_2 + 6OH^- \rightarrow 5Cl^- + ClO_3^- + 3H_2O$

Step 5: Sum of Coefficients
Sum = $3 (Cl_2) + 6 (OH^-) + 5 (Cl^-) + 1 (ClO_3^-) + 3 (H_2O) = 18$.

Answer: Balanced Eq: $3Cl_2 + 6OH^- \rightarrow 5Cl^- + ClO_3^- + 3H_2O$. Sum = $18$.
Problem 8: Back Titration Principle
$20 \text{ mL}$ of a solution containing $H_2O_2$ is reacted with an excess of acidic Potassium Iodide ($KI$) solution. The liberated Iodine requires $30 \text{ mL}$ of $0.2 \text{ N } Na_2S_2O_3$ solution for complete titration. Calculate the mass of $H_2O_2$ present per liter of the original solution.
View Solution

Step 1: Establish Equivalence Chain
By the Law of Equivalence, all reactants and products in a sequential series react in equal equivalents.
Equivalents of $H_2O_2$ = Equivalents of $I_2$ liberated = Equivalents of $Na_2S_2O_3$ used.

Step 2: Calculate Equivalents of Thiosulfate
Milliequivalents (meq) of $Na_2S_2O_3$ = Normality $\times$ Volume (in mL)
meq = $0.2 \text{ N} \times 30 \text{ mL} = 6.0 \text{ meq}$.
Therefore, meq of $H_2O_2$ originally present in the $20 \text{ mL}$ sample is $6.0 \text{ meq}$.

Step 3: Calculate Normality of H₂O₂
$N_1 \times V_1 = \text{meq}$
$N_{H_2O_2} \times 20 \text{ mL} = 6.0 \text{ meq}$
$N_{H_2O_2} = \frac{6.0}{20} = 0.3 \text{ N}$.

Step 4: Calculate Mass per Liter (Strength)
n-factor of $H_2O_2$ is 2. Equivalent weight = Molar Mass / 2 = $34 / 2 = 17 \text{ g/eq}$.
Strength ($\text{g/L}$) = Normality $\times$ Equivalent Weight
Strength = $0.3 \text{ eq/L} \times 17 \text{ g/eq} = 5.1 \text{ g/L}$.

Answer: Mass of $H_2O_2$ per liter is $5.1 \text{ grams}$.
Problem 9: The Permanganate Medium Shift
What volume of $0.1 \text{ M } KMnO_4$ is required to exactly oxidize $50 \text{ mL}$ of $0.1 \text{ M } FeSO_4$ in an acidic medium? What volume would be required if the reaction was carried out in a faintly alkaline/neutral medium (where $Fe^{2+}$ still goes to $Fe^{3+}$)?
View Solution

Step 1: Analyze Acidic Medium
In an acidic medium, $MnO_4^-$ reduces to $Mn^{2+}$. Change in O.S. is from $+7$ to $+2$. n-factor = 5.
For $FeSO_4$, $Fe^{2+}$ oxidizes to $Fe^{3+}$. n-factor = 1.
Equivalents of $KMnO_4$ = Equivalents of $FeSO_4$
$(M_1 \times n_1) \times V_1 = (M_2 \times n_2) \times V_2$
$(0.1 \times 5) \times V_1 = (0.1 \times 1) \times 50$
$0.5 \times V_1 = 5.0 \implies V_1 = 10 \text{ mL}$.

Step 2: Analyze Faintly Alkaline/Neutral Medium
In a neutral/faintly alkaline medium, $MnO_4^-$ reduces to solid $MnO_2$. Change in O.S. is from $+7$ to $+4$. n-factor = 3.
The n-factor for $FeSO_4$ remains 1.
$(M_1 \times n_1) \times V_1 = (M_2 \times n_2) \times V_2$
$(0.1 \times 3) \times V_1 = (0.1 \times 1) \times 50$
$0.3 \times V_1 = 5.0 \implies V_1 = \frac{5.0}{0.3} = 16.67 \text{ mL}$.

Answer: $10 \text{ mL}$ in acidic medium; $16.67 \text{ mL}$ in neutral/alkaline medium.
Problem 10: Double Indicator Trick Avoidance (Pure Redox)
$1.52 \text{ g}$ of a mixture of $KNO_3$ and $KNO_2$ was dissolved in water. The solution required $20 \text{ mL}$ of $0.1 \text{ M } KMnO_4$ in an acidic medium for complete oxidation. Calculate the percentage by mass of $KNO_2$ in the mixture. (Molar mass of $KNO_2 = 85 \text{ g/mol}$).
View Solution

Step 1: Identify the Redox Active Component
In $KNO_3$, Nitrogen is already in its highest oxidation state ($+5$). It cannot be oxidized further. Therefore, $KMnO_4$ only reacts with $KNO_2$ (where N is $+3$).

Step 2: Determine n-factors
$KMnO_4$ in acidic medium: n-factor = 5.
$KNO_2$ oxidizes to $KNO_3$ ($N^{3+} \rightarrow N^{5+}$): n-factor = 2.

Step 3: Apply Law of Equivalence
Equivalents of $KNO_2$ = Equivalents of $KMnO_4$
$\frac{\text{Mass of } KNO_2}{\text{Equivalent Weight}} = N \times V(\text{in L})$
Equivalent weight of $KNO_2 = \frac{M}{n} = \frac{85}{2} = 42.5 \text{ g/eq}$.
Normality of $KMnO_4 = M \times n = 0.1 \times 5 = 0.5 \text{ N}$.
$\frac{\text{Mass}}{42.5} = 0.5 \text{ eq/L} \times 0.020 \text{ L}$
$\frac{\text{Mass}}{42.5} = 0.010 \implies \text{Mass of } KNO_2 = 0.010 \times 42.5 = 0.425 \text{ g}$.

Step 4: Calculate Percentage
$\% \text{ of } KNO_2 = \left( \frac{0.425}{1.52} \right) \times 100 \approx 27.96\%$.

Answer: Percentage of $KNO_2$ is $27.96\%$.
Problem 11: The Butterfly Structure (CrO₅)
Determine the oxidation state of Chromium in $CrO_5$. If you calculate it algebraically as $+10$, explain why this is chemically impossible and derive the correct oxidation state using its molecular structure.
View Solution

Step 1: The Algebraic Trap
Assuming all Oxygen atoms have an oxidation state of $-2$:
$x + 5(-2) = 0 \implies x = +10$.
This is physically impossible because Chromium (Group 6, $[Ar] 4s^1 3d^5$) only has a maximum of 6 valence electrons to lose. The highest possible oxidation state for Cr is $+6$.

Step 2: Structural Analysis (The Butterfly)
$CrO_5$ contains peroxide linkages. Its structure features one Chromium atom double-bonded to one Oxygen atom, and single-bonded to four Oxygen atoms arranged in two peroxide rings ($-O-O-$). It looks like a butterfly.

Step 3: Assigning Correct Oxidation States
The one double-bonded Oxygen (oxide) is $-2$.
The four Oxygen atoms in peroxide linkages are each $-1$.
Let oxidation state of Cr be $x$:
$x + 1(-2) + 4(-1) = 0$
$x - 2 - 4 = 0 \implies x = +6$.

Answer: The true oxidation state of Chromium in $CrO_5$ is $+6$.
Problem 12: Complex n-factor of a Double Salt
Calculate the total n-factor of Ferrous Ammonium Sulfate (Mohr's Salt), $FeSO_4 \cdot (NH_4)_2SO_4 \cdot 6H_2O$, when it is completely oxidized by Potassium Dichromate ($K_2Cr_2O_7$) in an acidic medium. Also, calculate its equivalent weight.
View Solution

Step 1: Identify the Oxidizable Species
Look at every component in Mohr's salt:
- ${SO_4^{2-}}$: Sulfur is in $+6$, cannot be oxidized further.
- ${NH_4^+}$: Nitrogen is in $-3$. While theoretically oxidizable, under standard acidic titration conditions with Dichromate or Permanganate, the ammonium ion is highly stable and does not undergo oxidation.
- ${H_2O}$: Oxygen is $-2$, does not oxidize under these conditions.
- ${Fe^{2+}}$: Iron is $+2$. This is the only species that oxidizes to ${Fe^{3+}}$.

Step 2: Calculate n-factor
${Fe^{2+}} \rightarrow {Fe^{3+}} + 1e^-$.
Since there is exactly 1 mole of Iron per mole of Mohr's salt, the total n-factor = $1$.

Step 3: Calculate Equivalent Weight
Molar mass of Mohr's salt = $56 + 32 + 64 + 2(14 + 4) + 32 + 64 + 6(18) = 392 \text{ g/mol}$.
Equivalent weight = Molar Mass / n-factor = $392 / 1 = 392 \text{ g/eq}$.

Answer: n-factor is exactly $1$; Equivalent Weight is $392 \text{ g eq}^{-1}$.
Problem 13: The Purity of Bleaching Powder
$3.55 \text{ g}$ of a sample of Bleaching powder ($CaOCl_2$) was suspended in water and made up to $500 \text{ mL}$. $25 \text{ mL}$ of this suspension, when treated with excess $KI$ and dilute acetic acid, liberated Iodine which required $20 \text{ mL}$ of $0.1 \text{ N}$ Hypo (${Na_2S_2O_3}$) for titration. Calculate the percentage of "Available Chlorine" in the sample.
View Solution

Step 1: Concept of "Available Chlorine"
"Available Chlorine" refers to the mass of $Cl_2$ gas that can be liberated from the sample upon action with dilute acids, expressed as a percentage of the total mass of the sample.
Reaction: $CaOCl_2 + 2CH_3COOH \rightarrow Ca(CH_3COO)_2 + H_2O + Cl_2 \uparrow$.

Step 2: Iodometry Equivalence
The liberated $Cl_2$ reacts with $KI$ to liberate an equivalent amount of $I_2$, which is then titrated with Hypo.
Equivalents of $Cl_2$ in $25 \text{ mL}$ = Equivalents of Hypo used.
meq of $Cl_2$ (in $25 \text{ mL}$) = $0.1 \text{ N} \times 20 \text{ mL} = 2.0 \text{ meq}$.

Step 3: Scale up to Total Volume
If $25 \text{ mL}$ contains $2.0 \text{ meq}$ of $Cl_2$, then the total $500 \text{ mL}$ suspension contains:
Total meq of $Cl_2 = 2.0 \times \left(\frac{500}{25}\right) = 2.0 \times 20 = 40 \text{ meq} = 0.040 \text{ eq}$.

Step 4: Calculate Mass and Percentage
Equivalent weight of $Cl_2$ gas = Molar mass / 2 = $71 / 2 = 35.5 \text{ g/eq}$.
Mass of available $Cl_2 = 0.040 \text{ eq} \times 35.5 \text{ g/eq} = 1.42 \text{ g}$.
$\% \text{ Available Chlorine} = \left(\frac{1.42 \text{ g}}{3.55 \text{ g}}\right) \times 100 = 40\%$.

Answer: Percentage of Available Chlorine is $40\%$.
Problem 14: n-factor in Comproportionation
Determine the n-factor for Ammonium Nitrate ($NH_4NO_3$) when it undergoes thermal decomposition to yield Nitrous Oxide ($N_2O$) and water.
View Solution

Step 1: Write the balanced reaction
$NH_4NO_3 \xrightarrow{\Delta} N_2O + 2H_2O$

Step 2: Assign Oxidation States
In $NH_4^+$, Nitrogen is in $-3$ state.
In $NO_3^-$, Nitrogen is in $+5$ state.
In the product $N_2O$, both Nitrogen atoms are in an average $+1$ state.

Step 3: Analyze the Electron Transfer (Comproportionation)
This is a comproportionation reaction, the exact opposite of disproportionation. Two different atoms of the same element in the reactant meet at an intermediate oxidation state in the product.
Oxidation half: $N^{-3} \rightarrow N^{+1}$ (Loss of $4e^-$).
Reduction half: $N^{+5} \rightarrow N^{+1}$ (Gain of $4e^-$).
The number of electrons transferred internally per mole of the compound is exactly 4.

Answer: The n-factor for $NH_4NO_3$ in this reaction is exactly $4$.
Problem 15: Double Titration (Warder's Method)
A solution contains a mixture of $NaOH$ and $Na_2CO_3$. When titrated with $0.1 \text{ M } HCl$ using Phenolphthalein, it requires $30 \text{ mL}$ for the endpoint. However, if Methyl Orange is used from the very beginning, the endpoint requires $45 \text{ mL}$ of the same acid. What is the mass of $Na_2CO_3$ in the solution?
View Solution

Step 1: Understand Indicator Chemistry
Wait, standard double titration uses Phenolphthalein (Ph) first, then Methyl Orange (MeOH). Let's review the prompt. Ah, it gives two independent titrations from the start.
With Phenolphthalein: Neutralizes all strong base ($NaOH$) and exactly *half* of the carbonate ($Na_2CO_3 \rightarrow NaHCO_3$). Let equivalents of $NaOH$ be $a$ and equivalents of full $Na_2CO_3$ be $b$.
Volume for Ph ($V_1$): $a + \frac{b}{2} \propto 30 \text{ mL}$.

Step 2: Analyze Methyl Orange
Methyl Orange (MeOH) acts at a lower pH ($\approx 4$), meaning it neutralizes everything completely: all $NaOH$ and all $Na_2CO_3 \rightarrow CO_2 + H_2O$.
Volume for MeOH ($V_2$): $a + b \propto 45 \text{ mL}$.

Step 3: Solve Algebraically
Subtract Ph from MeOH:
$(a + b) - \left(a + \frac{b}{2}\right) = 45 - 30$
$\frac{b}{2} = 15 \implies b \propto 30 \text{ mL}$ of $0.1 \text{ M } HCl$.

Step 4: Calculate Mass of Na₂CO₃
Equivalents of $Na_2CO_3 (b) = N \times V = (0.1 \times 1) \times 0.030 \text{ L} = 0.003 \text{ eq}$.
Mass = Equivalents $\times$ Equivalent Weight.
Equivalent weight of $Na_2CO_3 = 106 / 2 = 53 \text{ g/eq}$.
Mass = $0.003 \times 53 = 0.159 \text{ g}$.

Answer: Mass of $Na_2CO_3$ is $0.159 \text{ g}$.
Problem 16: Redox Stoichiometry (Oxidation of Hydrazine)
Hydrazine ($N_2H_4$) is oxidized by Potassium Iodate ($KIO_3$) in the presence of concentrated $HCl$ to produce Nitrogen gas ($N_2$) and Iodine monochloride ($ICl$). How many moles of $KIO_3$ are required to completely oxidize $1 \text{ mole}$ of Hydrazine?
View Solution

Step 1: Oxidation Half-Reaction (Hydrazine)
$N_2H_4 \rightarrow N_2$.
Oxidation state of N goes from $-2$ to $0$. Change = $2$ per N atom. For 2 N atoms, total change = $4$.
n-factor of $N_2H_4 = 4$.

Step 2: Reduction Half-Reaction (Iodate)
In $KIO_3$, Iodine is in the $+5$ state.
In the product $ICl$ (Iodine monochloride), Chlorine is more electronegative ($-1$), so Iodine is forced into a $+1$ state.
Change = $|5 - 1| = 4$.
n-factor of $KIO_3 = 4$.

Step 3: Apply Equivalence
Equivalents of $N_2H_4$ = Equivalents of $KIO_3$
Moles of $N_2H_4 \times 4$ = Moles of $KIO_3 \times 4$
$1 \times 4 = \text{Moles of } KIO_3 \times 4 \implies \text{Moles of } KIO_3 = 1$.

Answer: Exactly $1 \text{ mole}$ of $KIO_3$ is required.
Problem 17: Molarity of an Oleum Sample (SO₃ content)
A $10 \text{ g}$ sample of Oleum (Fuming Sulfuric Acid, labeled as "$109\%$") is diluted with water and made up to $1 \text{ Liter}$. What volume of $0.5 \text{ M } NaOH$ will be required to completely neutralize $50 \text{ mL}$ of this diluted solution?
View Solution

Step 1: Understand the 109% Label
"$109\%$" means $100 \text{ g}$ of this oleum produces exactly $109 \text{ g}$ of pure $H_2SO_4$ when fully hydrated.
Therefore, our $10 \text{ g}$ sample, when fully diluted in water, will yield $10.9 \text{ g}$ of pure $H_2SO_4$.

Step 2: Calculate Molarity/Normality of the 1L Solution
Molar mass of $H_2SO_4 = 98 \text{ g/mol}$.
Moles of $H_2SO_4$ in 1 Liter = $10.9 / 98 = 0.1112 \text{ M}$.
Since it's dibasic, Normality ($N$) = $0.1112 \times 2 = 0.2224 \text{ N}$.

Step 3: Titration Equation
$N_{\text{acid}} \times V_{\text{acid}} = N_{\text{base}} \times V_{\text{base}}$
The $NaOH$ is $0.5 \text{ M}$, which is $0.5 \text{ N}$ (since $n=1$).
$0.2224 \times 50 \text{ mL} = 0.5 \times V_{\text{base}}$
$11.12 = 0.5 \times V_{\text{base}}$
$V_{\text{base}} = \frac{11.12}{0.5} = 22.24 \text{ mL}$.

Answer: $22.24 \text{ mL}$ of $0.5 \text{ M } NaOH$ is required.
Problem 18: Disproportionation in Basic Medium
Determine the equivalent weight of Iodine ($I_2$) when it reacts with hot, concentrated $NaOH$ solution. (Molar mass of $I_2 = 254$).
View Solution

Step 1: Write the chemical equation
With hot, concentrated base, halogens (except F) disproportionate into halide and halate ions.
$3I_2 + 6OH^- \rightarrow 5I^- + IO_3^- + 3H_2O$

Step 2: Calculate individual n-factors for I₂
Reduction: $I_2^0 \rightarrow 2I^{-1}$. Change = $|0 - (-1)| \times 2 = 2$. ($n_{red} = 2$).
Oxidation: $I_2^0 \rightarrow 2I^{+5}$. Change = $|0 - 5| \times 2 = 10$. ($n_{ox} = 10$).

Step 3: Calculate the total n-factor
Using the disproportionation formula:
$n_{total} = \frac{n_{ox} \times n_{red}}{n_{ox} + n_{red}} = \frac{10 \times 2}{10 + 2} = \frac{20}{12} = \frac{5}{3}$.

Step 4: Calculate Equivalent Weight
$E = \frac{M}{n_{total}} = \frac{254}{5/3} = \frac{254 \times 3}{5} = 152.4 \text{ g/eq}$.

Answer: Equivalent weight of Iodine is $152.4 \text{ g/eq}$.
Problem 19: Determining Oxidation State of Sulphur
Determine the absolute oxidation states of all Sulfur atoms in Sodium Thiosulfate (${Na_2S_2O_3}$). Why does the algebraic method fail here?
View Solution

Step 1: The Algebraic Failure
If we use algebra: $2(+1) + 2x + 3(-2) = 0 \implies 2x - 4 = 0 \implies x = +2$.
This implies both sulfur atoms have an oxidation state of $+2$, which contradicts the chemical structure of the molecule.

Step 2: Structural Analysis
The thiosulfate ion (${S_2O_3^{2-}}$) is structurally derived from the sulfate ion (${SO_4^{2-}}$) by replacing one Oxygen atom with a Sulfur atom. It consists of a central Sulfur atom bonded to three Oxygen atoms and one terminal Sulfur atom.
Structure: $[S=S(O_2)-O]^{2-}$

Step 3: Assigning Formal Oxidation States
By IUPAC convention, bonds between identical atoms (like S=S) are assumed to have electrons shared equally, unless they are in vastly different environments. Here, the central Sulfur is bonded to highly electronegative Oxygens, pulling electron density away, making it more electronegative relative to the terminal Sulfur.
However, standard structural assignment treats the terminal Sulfur almost like an Oxide (since it replaced an Oxygen).
Terminal Sulfur: Behaves as $S^{2-}$. Oxidation state = $-2$.
Central Sulfur: Bonded to three Oxygens ($+4$ contribution) and one terminal Sulfur acting as $-2$ ($+2$ contribution). Oxidation state = $+6$.

Step 4: Verify Average
Average = $\frac{+6 + (-2)}{2} = \frac{+4}{2} = +2$. The average matches the algebraic result, but the individual states are $+6$ and $-2$.

Answer: Central Sulfur is $+6$, Terminal Sulfur is $-2$.
Problem 20: Ore Analysis (Iron determination)
A $2.0 \text{ g}$ sample of iron ore containing iron as $Fe_2O_3$ is dissolved in acid. All the iron is carefully reduced to $Fe^{2+}$ using zinc dust. The resulting solution requires $40 \text{ mL}$ of $0.1 \text{ M } K_2Cr_2O_7$ for complete titration. Calculate the percentage of Iron in the ore. (Atomic mass of $Fe = 56$).
View Solution

Step 1: Volumetric Analysis
Reaction during titration: $Cr_2O_7^{2-} + 6Fe^{2+} + 14H^+ \rightarrow 2Cr^{3+} + 6Fe^{3+} + 7H_2O$.
n-factor of Dichromate = 6 (Chromium goes from $+6$ to $+3$, for 2 atoms = $2 \times 3 = 6$).
n-factor of $Fe^{2+}$ = 1.
Equivalents of $Fe^{2+}$ = Equivalents of $K_2Cr_2O_7$
$\text{Moles of } Fe \times 1 = \text{Molarity} \times \text{n-factor} \times \text{Volume in L}$
Moles of $Fe = 0.1 \text{ M} \times 6 \times 0.040 \text{ L} = 0.024 \text{ moles}$.

Step 2: Calculate Mass of Iron
Mass of $Fe = 0.024 \text{ moles} \times 56 \text{ g/mol} = 1.344 \text{ g}$.

Step 3: Calculate Percentage
Percentage of $Fe = \left(\frac{1.344}{2.0}\right) \times 100 = 67.2\%$.

Answer: The ore contains $67.2\%$ Iron by mass.
Problem 21: The Dichromate Paradox
Calculate the equivalent weight of Barium Dichromate, $BaCr_2O_7$ (Molar mass = $M$), when it acts as an oxidizing agent in an acidic medium. Also, calculate it if it were precipitated simply as a salt from $BaCl_2$ without any redox reaction occurring.
View Solution

Case A: As an Oxidizing Agent (Redox)
The active species is the Dichromate ion (${Cr_2O_7^{2-}}$).
In acidic medium, it reduces to $Cr^{3+}$.
$Cr^{+6} \rightarrow Cr^{+3}$. Change = 3 electrons per Chromium. Since there are 2 Chromium atoms, total change = $6e^-$.
n-factor = 6. Equivalent weight = $M / 6$.

Case B: As a Precipitating Salt (Non-Redox)
In a double displacement or precipitation reaction, no electrons are transferred. The n-factor is defined by the total positive (or negative) charge on the ions in one formula unit.
$BaCr_2O_7$ consists of $Ba^{2+}$ and $Cr_2O_7^{2-}$. Total positive charge = 2.
n-factor = 2. Equivalent weight = $M / 2$.

Answer: Redox Eq Wt = $M/6$. Precipitation Eq Wt = $M/2$.
Problem 22: Mixing Two Oxidizing Agents
$100 \text{ mL}$ of $0.1 \text{ M } KMnO_4$ and $100 \text{ mL}$ of $0.05 \text{ M } K_2Cr_2O_7$ are mixed together in a highly acidic medium. What volume of $0.5 \text{ M}$ Mohr's salt ($FeSO_4 \cdot (NH_4)_2SO_4 \cdot 6H_2O$) is required to completely reduce this mixture?
View Solution

Step 1: Calculate Total Oxidizing Equivalents
Since both are oxidants, their oxidizing powers are additive.
Eq of $KMnO_4 = M \times n \times V = 0.1 \times 5 \times 0.100 \text{ L} = 0.05 \text{ eq}$.
Eq of $K_2Cr_2O_7 = M \times n \times V = 0.05 \times 6 \times 0.100 \text{ L} = 0.03 \text{ eq}$.
Total Oxidizing Equivalents = $0.05 + 0.03 = 0.08 \text{ eq}$.

Step 2: Set up Mohr's Salt Equation
Mohr's salt contains $Fe^{2+}$, which oxidizes to $Fe^{3+}$ (n-factor = 1).
Eq of Mohr's salt = Total Oxidizing Eq
$M \times n \times V = 0.08$
$0.5 \times 1 \times V = 0.08$
$V = \frac{0.08}{0.5} = 0.16 \text{ Liters} = 160 \text{ mL}$.

Answer: $160 \text{ mL}$ of Mohr's salt solution is required.
Problem 23: Disproportionation of Hydrogen Peroxide
Determine the n-factor and Equivalent Weight of $H_2O_2$ when it completely decomposes spontaneously. (Molar mass = 34).
View Solution

Step 1: Write the decomposition reaction
$2H_2O_2 \rightarrow 2H_2O + O_2$

Step 2: Assign Oxidation States
Oxygen in Peroxide ($H_2O_2$) = $-1$.
Oxygen in Water ($H_2O$) = $-2$ (Reduction).
Oxygen in Oxygen gas ($O_2$) = $0$ (Oxidation).

Step 3: Calculate individual n-factors per mole of $H_2O_2$
For reduction ($H_2O_2 \rightarrow H_2O$): O.S. changes from $-1$ to $-2$. Change = 1 per Oxygen. Since $H_2O_2$ has 2 Oxygens, $n_{red} = 2$.
For oxidation ($H_2O_2 \rightarrow O_2$): O.S. changes from $-1$ to $0$. Change = 1 per Oxygen. Since $H_2O_2$ has 2 Oxygens, $n_{ox} = 2$.

Step 4: Combine using Disproportionation Formula
$n_{total} = \frac{n_{ox} \times n_{red}}{n_{ox} + n_{red}} = \frac{2 \times 2}{2 + 2} = \frac{4}{4} = 1$.

Step 5: Equivalent Weight
$E = \frac{M}{n} = \frac{34}{1} = 34 \text{ g/eq}$.

Note: When acting purely as an oxidant or purely as a reductant in a titration, the n-factor of $H_2O_2$ is 2. But during its own disproportionation, the effective overall n-factor evaluates to 1.

Answer: n-factor = $1$; Equivalent Weight = $34 \text{ g eq}^{-1}$.
Problem 24: Finding Molar Mass via Titration
$0.5 \text{ g}$ of a metal cation $M^{2+}$ was oxidized to $M^{4+}$ by exactly $20 \text{ mL}$ of $0.1 \text{ M } K_2Cr_2O_7$ in an acidic medium. Calculate the atomic mass of the metal M.
View Solution

Step 1: Equivalents of Oxidant
$K_2Cr_2O_7$ n-factor = 6.
Eq of Dichromate = $M \times n \times V = 0.1 \times 6 \times 0.020 = 0.012 \text{ eq}$.

Step 2: Equivalents of Reductant
The metal goes from $+2$ to $+4$, so its n-factor = $2$.
Let atomic mass be $X$. Equivalent weight = $X / 2$.
Equivalents of Metal = $\frac{\text{Mass}}{\text{Eq. Wt}} = \frac{0.5}{X/2} = \frac{1.0}{X}$.

Step 3: Equate and Solve
$\frac{1.0}{X} = 0.012$
$X = \frac{1.0}{0.012} = 83.33 \text{ g/mol}$.

Answer: The atomic mass of the metal is $83.33 \text{ u}$ (likely Krypton chemically, but structurally hypothetical for a metallic cation in this context).
Problem 25: Master Challenge - Iodometry of Copper & Arsenic
A mixture of $Cu^{2+}$ and $AsO_3^{3-}$ is titrated. First, excess $KI$ is added, liberating $I_2$ which requires $30 \text{ mL}$ of $0.1 \text{ M } Na_2S_2O_3$. The resulting solution is made slightly alkaline (bicarbonate buffer) and titrated with $0.05 \text{ M } I_2$ solution to oxidize the Arsenite ($AsO_3^{3-}$) to Arsenate ($AsO_4^{3-}$). This step required $20 \text{ mL}$ of the $I_2$ solution. Calculate the millimoles of $Cu^{2+}$ and $AsO_3^{3-}$ initially present.
View Solution

Step 1: First Titration (Cu²⁺ analysis)
In an acidic/neutral medium, $Cu^{2+}$ reacts with $I^-$ to liberate $I_2$, but Arsenite ($AsO_3^{3-}$) does not react with $I_2$ (the equilibrium favors the reverse reaction without a basic buffer).
So, the first titration strictly measures $Cu^{2+}$.
n-factor of $Cu^{2+} \rightarrow Cu^+$ is 1. n-factor of Hypo is 1.
moles of $Cu^{2+} \times 1 = 30 \text{ mL} \times 0.1 \text{ M} \times 1$
Millimoles of $Cu^{2+} = 3.0 \text{ mmol}$.

Step 2: Second Titration (Arsenite analysis)
When the buffer is added, the $I_2$ can now quantitatively oxidize Arsenite to Arsenate.
$AsO_3^{3-} + I_2 + H_2O \rightarrow AsO_4^{3-} + 2I^- + 2H^+$
Arsenic goes from $+3$ to $+5$, so n-factor = 2.
The titrant is $I_2$ solution. $I_2$ goes from $0$ to $-1$ (2 atoms), so n-factor = 2.
Equivalents of Arsenite = Equivalents of $I_2$
$\text{mmol of } AsO_3^{3-} \times 2 = \text{Molarity of } I_2 \times \text{n-factor} \times \text{Volume}$
$\text{mmol of } AsO_3^{3-} \times 2 = 0.05 \times 2 \times 20$
$\text{mmol of } AsO_3^{3-} \times 2 = 2.0 \implies \text{mmol of } AsO_3^{3-} = 1.0 \text{ mmol}$.

Answer: $3.0 \text{ mmol}$ of $Cu^{2+}$ and $1.0 \text{ mmol}$ of $AsO_3^{3-}$.

Mastering the Exchange of Electrons

Congratulations on powering through these 25 highly rigorous numericals. Redox reactions form the absolute backbone of analytical volumetric chemistry. The secret to conquering JEE Advanced questions in this domain is letting go of mole-to-mole stoichiometry and fully embracing the Law of Chemical Equivalence. By quickly and accurately identifying the n-factor—especially in tricky cases like disproportionation and double salts—you can solve complex titration problems in a fraction of the time.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1. Why does the n-factor of KMnO₄ change depending on the medium?
The availability of $H^+$ or $OH^-$ ions dictates how many Oxygen atoms can be stripped from the Permanganate ion to form water. In a highly acidic medium, it has plenty of protons to form water, allowing it to reduce all the way from $+7$ to $Mn^{2+}$ (n-factor = 5). In a neutral/weakly alkaline medium, it stops at solid $MnO_2$ ($+4$, n-factor = 3). In strongly alkaline, it forms Manganate $MnO_4^{2-}$ ($+6$, n-factor = 1).
Q2. What is the difference between Iodimetry and Iodometry?
Iodimetry is a direct titration where a standard solution of Iodine ($I_2$) is directly used to oxidize a reducing agent (like Arsenite or Thiosulfate). Iodometry is an indirect method where an oxidizing agent (like $Cu^{2+}$ or $KMnO_4$) is first reacted with excess $KI$ to liberate Iodine. This liberated Iodine is then titrated against standard Thiosulfate.
Q3. Can an element have a fractional oxidation state?
Physically, no. An atom cannot lose or gain a fraction of an electron. A fractional oxidation state (like $+16/3$ in $Br_3O_8$ or $+8/3$ in $Fe_3O_4$) simply represents the mathematical average of multiple atoms of the same element existing in different absolute integer oxidation states within the same molecule or crystal lattice.
Q4. How do you calculate the n-factor of a disproportionation reaction?
In disproportionation, the same substance acts as both the oxidant and the reductant. You must split the reaction into oxidation and reduction halves, find the n-factor for each half ($n_{ox}$ and $n_{red}$), and then combine them using the harmonic mean formula: $n_{total} = (n_{ox} \times n_{red}) / (n_{ox} + n_{red})$.
Powered by

๐Ÿ“š Also Read

Lecture Notes

No comments:

Post a Comment

Featured Post

Most Important Name Reactions in Organic Chemistry | Chemca